ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2025
Electrochemical Point-of-Care Test for Assessing Serum Paracetamol Concentration: Comparison With Traditional Methods and Detection of Concomitant Drugs.
Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrochemical Point-of-Care Test for Assessing Serum Paracetamol Concentration: Comparison With Traditional Methods and Detection of Concomitant Drugs.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid serum paracetamol (acetaminophen) concentration measurement is essential in suspected intoxication, but centralized laboratory analyses often delay initiation of antidotal therapy. We studied the feasibility of a novel electrochemical single-walled carbon nanotube/Nafion-based point-of-care (POC) method in detecting paracetamol in 99 suspected overdose patient serum samples. POC was compared with the standard photoelectric enzymatic method (PEM) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array and corona-charged aerosol detector (UHPLC-DAD-CAD). We also analysed for 900 concomitant pharmaceuticals, drugs and chemicals in 197 samples with time-of-flight mass spectrometry to assess interference with paracetamol concentration measurements. Paracetamol concentrations measured with UHPLC-DAD-CAD ranged between 0 and 2100 μmol/L, with 19% above the therapeutic level (≥ 200 μmol/L). Comparing POC with UHPLC-DAD-CAD, the false positives and negatives were 10% and 15%, respectively, at concentrations ≥ 30 μmol/L. All POC method false negatives occurred at concentrations < 45 μmol/L. PEM showed 8% false positives and negatives compared with UHPLC-DAD-CAD. Other substances detected included caffeine (78%), antidepressants (41%), benzodiazepines (34%) and antipsychotics (28%). They did not interfere with POC concentration measurement. The novel POC method is promising for measuring serum paracetamol at relevant concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.