ReviewJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2025
Insight in the Unmet Needs Encountered During the Management of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy.
Review in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical heterogeneity in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: data-driven subtypes challenge current classification.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Insight in the Unmet Needs Encountered During the Management of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare acquired immune-mediated disorder affecting peripheral nerves, manifesting most commonly as symmetric, proximal, and distal weakness with sensory loss. Although the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guidelines provide evidence-based and consensus-driven approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP, challenges to optimal patient care persist. This report aims to highlight the unmet needs in CIDP management. A structured analysis of existing evidence was conducted to map gaps in CIDP care pathways, emphasizing diagnostic criteria, assessment of the therapeutic response, and disease management. Recognized key gaps and unmet needs in CIDP include (1) the absence of specific biomarkers for CIDP, (2) weighing the relative value of various CIDP metrics and interpreting what those metrics say about disease activity and treatment response, and (3) understanding the optimal timing and approach to assess treatment efficacy (or failure). There exists variability in how diagnostic and treatment guidelines are utilized, as well as how (and if) outcome metrics are utilized to guide informed treatment decisions. At least part of the confusion stems from the absence of terms commonly used during the CIDP treatment journey, including "response," "refractory," "remission," and "relapse." To address these ambiguities, a consensus-driven effort is needed to establish standardized definitions for key treatment milestones in CIDP. Harmonizing terminology will not only facilitate more accurate clinical assessments but also promote more robust and comparable research outcomes, ultimately improving the care of individuals with CIDP. This report underscores the critical unmet needs in CIDP diagnosis and management. By identifying barriers and facilitators within the current CIDP landscape, we hope to optimize clinical decision-making and focus research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.