Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41054272›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2025

Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Scoping Review and Multidisciplinary Consensus Recommendations of the Spanish Observatory of Infection in Surgery.

Josep M Badia, Inés Rubio-Pérez, Carlos Morales-Pérez, José Bueno-Lledó, Laura M Rodríguez-Lorenzo, Joan Sancho, Oliver Marín-Peña, Susana López, Jaume Masià, José M Balibrea

Abstract readScoping ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josep M BadiaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-5233
Inés Rubio-PérezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-6865
Carlos Morales-PérezCardiac Surgery Service, Central University Hospital of Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6592-0428
José Bueno-LledóDepartment of Surgery, Unit of Abdominal Wall, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3116-5022
Laura M Rodríguez-LorenzoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2977-4627
Joan SanchoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4603-0363
Oliver Marín-PeñaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery & Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-5766
Susana LópezDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Hospital Universitari Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume MasiàDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Hospital Universitari Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-9586
José M BalibreaDepartment of Surgery, Endocrine-Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias, Badalona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-7179

Funding

Smith and Nephew
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) and surgical site complications (SSC) significantly impact surgery outcomes, increasing hospital stays and mortality rates, and negatively affecting patients' quality of life. Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) emerged as a prophylactic strategy to reduce these complications. However, its applicability across different surgical procedures remains unclear. A scoping review was conducted to synthesise the available evidence on the use of ciNPT in different surgical contexts. A multidisciplinary panel of experts from different surgical specialties was assembled to identify patient risk factors for SSCs specific to each modality. Surgical procedures were categorised based on anticipated SSC rates and the impact of SSI. A decision diagram was finally developed, providing tailored recommendations for ciNPT use according to individual surgical circumstances. The findings of the review indicate that ciNPT effectively reduces SSI and SSC in most surgical procedures. Key patient-related factors influencing outcomes, such as age, obesity, and malnutrition, were outlined. Additionally, a specialty-based list of surgical procedures was compiled, specifying whether ciNPT is recommended, not recommended, or conditionally recommended based on specific criteria. This study underscores the benefits of ciNPT and provides a comprehensive guide to its application across several surgical specialties, aiming to optimise patient management and inform clinical practise.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapySurgical Wound InfectionFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSpainconsensus recommendationnegative‐pressure wound therapyseroma/prevention and control*surgical wound*/complicationssurgical wound infection/epidemiologywound healing

Identifiers

PMID41054272
PMCPMC12501416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.