ReviewThe Medical journal of Australia2025
Using generative artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a narrative review and proposed agenda for implementation.
Review in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Language Model for Age-Specific Patient Education in Pediatric Orthopaedics.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Equipping the next generation: addressing the unmet need for artificial intelligence education at research performing organizations.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- A pragmatic risk-stratified framework for using large language models in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Review
- General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence Use in Routine Mental Health Practice Among Australian Clinicians: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Beyond Human Error: Building Intelligent Resilience for Medication Safety in the ICU.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assistive, not autonomous: Generative artificial intelligence in head and neck cancer care - A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.