ArticleJournal of texture studies2025
Understanding the Influence of Sensory Characteristics on Emotional Responses and Acceptance of Insect-Based Spreads.
Article in Journal of texture studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding the Influence of Sensory Characteristics on Emotional Responses and Acceptance of Insect-Based Spreads.Journal of texture studies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite growing interest in insect consumption, consumers' acceptance of insects as a food source remains low due to strong negative emotions like fear and disgust. Incorporating invisible insect (e.g., insect powder) into regular foods could address this reluctance. This study aimed to explore the impact of sensory characteristics on emotional responses, liking, and willingness to eat savory and sweet spreads enriched with insect powder. Savory and sweet spreads were combined with 1.5% and 3% of migratory locust (Locusta migratoria) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus) powder. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) and Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) were used to investigate sensory and emotional characteristics of samples, respectively. Samples containing 1.5% cricket powder mostly resulted in a more positive experience for both spreads, while 1.5% locust powder did not evoke any emotions. On the other hand, the inclusion of 3% insect powder generally evoked negative emotions like disgust and dissatisfaction. Samples containing 1.5% insect powder showed a higher preference compared to 3% ones in both spreads. Tomato taste, tomato aroma, sweet, and sour were key factors in determining the liking for savory spreads, while sweet, strawberry taste, and strawberry aroma played a significant role in the liking of sweet spreads. There was a significant increase in the participants' willingness to eat insect-based foods in the future after tasting them. This study suggests that the inclusion of 1.5% cricket powder shows promise in the development of both sweet and savory spreads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.