Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053914›Full record

ArticleJournal of texture studies2025

Understanding the Influence of Sensory Characteristics on Emotional Responses and Acceptance of Insect-Based Spreads.

Ditta Hakha Soleha, Matthijs Dekker, Maryia Mishyna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of texture studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ditta Hakha SolehaFood Quality and Design Group, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0258-2828
Matthijs DekkerFood Quality and Design Group, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-4252
Maryia MishynaFood Quality and Design Group, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-8156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in insect consumption, consumers' acceptance of insects as a food source remains low due to strong negative emotions like fear and disgust. Incorporating invisible insect (e.g., insect powder) into regular foods could address this reluctance. This study aimed to explore the impact of sensory characteristics on emotional responses, liking, and willingness to eat savory and sweet spreads enriched with insect powder. Savory and sweet spreads were combined with 1.5% and 3% of migratory locust (Locusta migratoria) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus) powder. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) and Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) were used to investigate sensory and emotional characteristics of samples, respectively. Samples containing 1.5% cricket powder mostly resulted in a more positive experience for both spreads, while 1.5% locust powder did not evoke any emotions. On the other hand, the inclusion of 3% insect powder generally evoked negative emotions like disgust and dissatisfaction. Samples containing 1.5% insect powder showed a higher preference compared to 3% ones in both spreads. Tomato taste, tomato aroma, sweet, and sour were key factors in determining the liking for savory spreads, while sweet, strawberry taste, and strawberry aroma played a significant role in the liking of sweet spreads. There was a significant increase in the participants' willingness to eat insect-based foods in the future after tasting them. This study suggests that the inclusion of 1.5% cricket powder shows promise in the development of both sweet and savory spreads.

Indexed as

EmotionsFood PreferencesAdultAnimalsConsumer BehaviorFemaleGryllidaeHumansLocusta migratoriaMaleOdorantsTasteYoung AdultCATAdriversfood‐evoked emotionsinsect‐based foodnovel foodRATAwillingness to eat

Identifiers

PMID41053914
PMCPMC12501046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.