ArticleBorderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation2025
Decoding personality functioning: the impact of DSM-5 pathological traits mediated by emotion dysregulation and metacognition.
Article in Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Problematic internet use and borderline personality features: A systematic review informed by the alternative model of personality disorders.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2026Pooled it
- Personality Pathology and Functional Outcomes During Pharmacological Treatment of Adult ADHD.Personality and mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersonality disorders (PDs) have long been studied in adulthood, with relatively limited attention to their developmental course during adolescence. Recent research, however, underscores the importance of early identification and intervention in youth, as personality pathology can be reliably detected in this period and is associated with significant functional impairments. Grounded in the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), the present study explores potential intrapsychic mechanisms linking maladaptive trait domains to global personality functioning in adolescents. Drawing on developmental theories that emphasize the role of self-regulatory and reflective capacities in personality development, we examined whether emotion dysregulation and metacognitive difficulties help explain the relationship between pathological traits and functioning.
methodsA sample of 470 Iranian adolescents aged 14-17 years completed validated measures of personality traits, emotion regulation, metacognition, and personality functioning. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and mediation analysis.
resultsAll trait domains except antagonism were significantly associated with poorer functioning. Mediation analyses suggested that both emotion dysregulation and metacognition partially accounted for these associations, particularly for negative affectivity, detachment, disinhibition, and psychoticism.
conclusionsThese findings support developmental models of personality by highlighting the interplay between emotion regulation and metacognition in shaping adolescent personality functioning. While the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-report measures limit causal interpretations, the study emphasizes the importance of incorporating emotion regulation and metacognitive processes into early assessments and interventions. Future research should employ longitudinal and multi-method approaches to further clarify the developmental pathways underlying personality pathology in adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.