ArticleBiology of sex differences2025
Sex dependency of subconscious visual perception.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Males are more susceptible to neurodevelopmental cognitive deficits in their perception of visual information. Subliminally-presented visual stimuli might be subconsciously perceived and consequently influence upcoming decisions, however it is still unclear whether subconscious perception differs between males and females. In this study, young adults performed a two-choice target detection task. In the Baseline condition (trials), participants relied only on their ability to detect the target. In the Cued-conscious condition, a visual cue (information) was presented (250 ms) on the same side of an upcoming target and indicated its location (left/right). In the Subliminal-same condition, a briefly presented (~16 ms) cue correctly indicated the target location, however in the Subliminal-opposite condition the cue was shown on the opposite side of the upcoming target and provided incorrect information. Participants' performance in the Cued-conscious condition was significantly higher than the Baseline and subliminal conditions. In both females and males, performance in the Subliminal-same and Subliminal-opposite conditions was higher and lower than the Baseline condition respectively; indicating that the subliminal cues (information) affected upcoming decisions. However, the effects were significantly larger in males, suggesting males express heightened sensitivity to subliminal visual information, compared to age- and education-matched females. In both males and females, background acoustic stimuli (Music, White noise or Silence) influenced conscious and subconscious visual information processing. Autonomic nervous system activity, assessed through event-related electrodermal activity, was also differentially modulated by supraliminal and subliminal visual information. Our findings indicate remarkable sex dependency in the effects of subliminal visual information on cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.