Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053812›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Biosecurity practices and their determining factors in commercial layer chickens in selected regions of Tanzania.

Siha Mdemu, Augustine B Matondo, Jens Peter Christensen, Ahmed E Amasha, Helena A Ngowi, Erica Westwood, Sunday O Ochai, Hezron E Nonga, Kristina Osbjer, Robinson H Mdegela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siha MdemuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. sihamdemu@yahoo.com.
Augustine B MatondoDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Jens Peter ChristensenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Ahmed E AmashaUniversity Farm, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Helena A NgowiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Erica WestwoodInternational Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions (ICARS), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sunday O OchaiInternational Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions (ICARS), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hezron E NongaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Kristina OsbjerInternational Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions (ICARS), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robinson H MdegelaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.

Funding

International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions (ICARS) DVMPH028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBiosecurity measures are crucial for controlling infectious diseases in poultry farms. It involves all measures aiming at preventing disease-causing agents from entering the farm (external biosecurity) and those measures practiced with the aim of preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms within the farm (internal biosecurity). However, their implementation is often limited in low-income countries due to various factors such as socioeconomic challenges, farming practices and limited resources. The aim of this study was to explore the current biosecurity levels and their related factors in commercial layer chicken farms.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 203 randomly selected commercial layer farms with ≥ 200 birds across Dar es Salaam (n = 154), Morogoro (n = 28), and Unguja (n = 21) regions from March-June 2023. Biosecurity practices were scored using an adapted Biocheck.UGent™ tool (0-100 scale). One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and t-tests were used for comparing biosecurity scores across groups when data met normality assumptions, while the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) H test and Mann-Whitney (M-W) test served as alternatives when the normality assumption was not met. Further, we used multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with biosecurity implementation; with results reported as standardized beta coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsMean biosecurity scores were significantly (p < .001) below global benchmarks with overall biosecurity 58.2 ± 8.6, external biosecurity (preventing disease entry) at 60.5 ± 8.7 and internal biosecurity (preventing disease spread within the farm) at 52.9 ± 14.5 compared to global averages of 72%, 67% and 77% respectively. The average external biosecurity scores was significantly lower in farms supervised by farmers with primary education (57.8 ± 7.9) than both those under farmers with secondary education (61.3 ± 9.3, p = .042) and tertiary education (62.1 ± 8.2, p = .019). Farm experience of > 2 years significantly improved internal biosecurity practices (55.0 ± 14.6 vs. 47.0 ± 12.9, p = .002). Further, large-scale operations demonstrated superior internal biosecurity compared to small-scale farms (63.1 ± 16.4 vs. 51.5 ± 12.8, p = .002). Multiple regression analysis (F₇,₁₉₅=2.279, p = .030, R²=0.076) revealed that secondary education (β = 0.224, 95% CI: 1.03-6.73, p = .007) and tertiary education (β = 0.209, 95% CI: 0.82-7.20, p = .014) were independently associated with higher biosecurity scores compared to primary education.

conclusionThis paper provides the first assessment of biosecurity implementation in commercial layer farms in Tanzania comparing it with global benchmarks. Biosecurity implementations were largely influenced by three key factors; education level, scale of production, and farming experience. These findings indicate that tailored interventions and evidenced-based policies are essential for strengthening biosecurity practices, and potentially enhancing poultry health and productivity in layer farms.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBiosecurityChickensPoultry DiseasesAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleTanzaniaBiocheck.UGent™Biosecurity measuresCross-sectionalFarmsPoultry diseases

Identifiers

PMID41053812
PMCPMC12502275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.