Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053786›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

The CAM-P-OS study protocol: a prospective randomized multicenter trial evaluating an active controlled motion device in the rehabilitation of surgically treated, isolated ankle fractures of Weber types B and C.

Michael Nienhaus, Kai Kronfeld, Olga Schulowski, Claudia Wolf, Juergen Konradi, Ulrich Betz, Erol Gercek

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael NienhausDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. michael.nienhaus@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-3086
Kai KronfeldInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Olga SchulowskiInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Claudia WolfInstitute of Physical Therapy, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Juergen KonradiInstitute of Physical Therapy, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Ulrich BetzInstitute of Physical Therapy, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Erol GercekDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisplaced ankle fractures classified as Weber types B and C are common across all age groups. The standard treatment involves open reduction and internal fixation, followed by a rehabilitation program that includes 6 weeks of partial weightbearing. During this period, both passive and active range-of-motion exercises are performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist. Recently, a new device has become available, allowing active controlled motion of the ankle joint at home on top of the normal rehabilitation protocol. The purpose of this controlled randomized trial was to evaluate the superiority of this device as a supplement in standard rehabilitation protocols after distal fibular fractures.

methodsThis prospective controlled multicenter trial will include a minimum of 58 patients who have undergone surgical treatment for isolated distal fibular fractures of Weber types B and C. These patients will be randomized into 2 groups: Group 1 will undergo a standardized rehabilitation protocol with active and passive physiotherapy under partial weightbearing for 6 weeks with the active controlled motion device at home on top. Group 2 will receive the same rehabilitation without the device. Three German hospitals with different levels of care and 6 rehabilitation centers are involved in this study. The estimated study duration of 12 months started in October 2024. The follow-up will last 6 months after the recruitment of the last patient. The following assessments are performed: baseline after surgery; after 6 weeks; at 3 and 6 months; and with check-in calls after 2 and 4 weeks. The evaluation of effectiveness is based on FAOS, NRS, and SF-36 scores; changes in employment during the study; return-to-work; return-to-sports; and time-to-unrestricted weightbearing. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to collect valid data to determine whether the use of an active controlled motion device as a supplement to a standardized physiotherapy protocol after surgical treatment of ankle fractures leads to significantly improved outcomes. After evaluation of the results by the German Joint Federal Committee, a final assessment is made to make this device part of a future treatment protocol in the aftercare of surgically treated distal fibular fractures of Weber types B and C.

trial registrationThe trial is registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization with the Main-ID DRKS00034202 on July 22nd, 2024 ( https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx ?TrialID=DRKS00034202).

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesAnkle JointExercise TherapyFibulaFracture Fixation, InternalAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularActive-controlled motionAnkle fracturesMedical deviceRctRehabilitationTrial protocol

Identifiers

PMID41053786
PMCPMC12498440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.