Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053775›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2025

Identification and conservation of critical nodes for shorebirds based on migration network perspective.

Qing Xiao, Houlang Duan, Bingrun Zhu, Shaoxia Xia, Zhengwang Zhang, Xiubo Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qing XiaoKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Houlang DuanKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. duanhl@igsnrr.ac.cn.
Bingrun ZhuBirdEyes, Centre for Global Ecological Change, Faculties of Science & Engineering and Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, Zaailand 110, Leeuwarden, 8911 BN, The Netherlands.
Shaoxia XiaKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. xiasx@igsnrr.ac.cn.
Zhengwang ZhangKey Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Xiubo YuKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF0802400National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270518National Natural Science Foundation of China 42101105Science and technology basic resources survey project 2021FY101002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe degradation and loss of critical nodes in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) migration network could have implications for the migration of shorebirds. The conservation of critical nodes along the EAAF is important for maintaining the stability of migratory networks. However, identifying these nodes remains a major challenge.

methodsWe used a network method that integrates GPS tracking data and remote sensing data to identify critical nodes for three shorebird species (Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata), and Pied Avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta)) in migratory networks along the EAAF and priority conservation areas to facilitate the development of conservation and management plans.

resultsA total of 111, 37, and 81 nodes in the migratory networks were identified for the Black-tailed Godwit, Eurasian Curlew, and Pied Avocet, respectively; these included 25, 13, and 16 critical nodes, respectively. Node importance (node betweenness) was higher in the migration period than in the breeding and wintering periods. Habitat loss was observed in most stopover nodes. A total of 23 unprotected critical nodes were identified as priority conservation areas.

conclusionsHabitat loss was observed in most of the unprotected critical nodes in stopover regions for all three species. The inclusion of these sites such as Haoyao sumu forest farm and Tianjin coast, into flyway site networks (the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership (EAAFP)) should be prioritized, and the habitat quality of nearby alternative nodes should be improved. Future studies should focus on developing new node indexes that integrate ecological variables with each node's role in maintaining network connectivity using data from a larger number of tracked individuals and birdwatching data. Such studies could help identify currently unknown regions with critical habitats.

Indexed as

Critical nodesGPS trackingHabitat lossNetwork connectivityShorebirds

Identifiers

PMID41053775
PMCPMC12502238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.