Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053741›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Caregiver recruitment and engagement: identifying best practices and strategies for including family caregivers of veterans in health services research.

Victoria Ngo, Luci K Leykum, Andrea F Kalvesmaki, Stuti Dang, Polly H Noël, Mary Jo Pugh, Roxana E Delgado, Erin D Bouldin, Julie Parish, Ranak B Trivedi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victoria NgoDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA. Victoria.Ngo@va.gov.
Luci K LeykumDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrea F KalvesmakiDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Stuti DangDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Polly H NoëlDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Mary Jo PughDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Roxana E DelgadoDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Erin D BouldinDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Julie ParishDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Ranak B TrivediDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research Team

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX002767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregivers are integral to the care of patients and possess important perspectives regarding improving healthcare delivery. Yet, caregivers are seldom engaged in research in part because of challenges recruiting and retaining them. We sought to identify best practices for recruiting and retaining caregivers in health services research, drawing from researcher experiences in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

methodsWe identified VA Health Systems Research (HSR) funded studies that focused on caregivers of Veterans by reviewing ongoing and completed projects from 2017 through 2024. "Caregiver" was defined as family members and/or friends who helped Veterans manage their health issues. We interviewed principal investigators and study team members to characterize their recruitment and retention practices. We further examined their studies' published methods and results to summarize the breadth of strategies used, and to identify those that were most effective based on informants' impressions of what worked.

resultsSeventeen research team members from 11 studies at six sites participated. Studies were observational (8 studies, n = 4183), experimental (2 studies, n = 237), and implementation-focused (1 study, n = 435), and included 4855 caregivers. All studies utilized multiple recruitment approaches, most commonly directly approaching potential participants, utilizing administrative data, and advertising. The most successful practices were: (1) directly approaching Veterans and caregivers; (2) recruiting through clinics; (3) reviewing registries of prior study participants; and (4) using administrative data to identify potential candidates. Flexible, virtual scheduling and individualized participant activities utilizing multiple participation modalities were helpful for caregiver retention.

conclusionsSuccessfully recruiting and retaining caregivers requires multiple strategies, and researcher flexibility. Health services researchers should prioritize direct outreach, outreach through trusted clinicians, and establishing registries to optimize efforts. Researchers should also use methods that allow for flexible, individualized participation to maximize retention. Enhancing caregiver-focused research through optimizing caregiver engagement will ultimately improve the evidence base necessary to inform care delivery and policy.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyHealth Services ResearchPatient SelectionVeteransFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsCaregiving researchParticipant engagementRecruitment strategiesStudy participantsTarget population

Identifiers

PMID41053741
PMCPMC12502154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.