Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053734›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025

Machine learning-based prediction of N2 lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Eren Erdogdu, İlkay Öksüz, Salih Duman, Berker Ozkan, Sukru Mehmet Erturk, Doğu Vurallı Bakkaloğlu, Murat Kara, Alper Toker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eren ErdogduDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-0107
İlkay ÖksüzDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-0534
Salih DumanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. salih.duman@istanbul.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-7326
Berker OzkanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2157-4778
Sukru Mehmet ErturkDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4086-675X
Doğu Vurallı BakkaloğluDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7671-0100
Murat KaraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8429-774X
Alper TokerDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-2339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Accurate staging of mediastinal lymph nodes is a crucial step in determining appropriate treatment approaches. Current noninvasive diagnostic methods do not provide sufficient accuracy to confidently decide on surgery without histological confirmation. Our study aimed to develop a artificial intelligence model for the precise prediction of N2 lymph node metastasis.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1489 patients who underwent standard cervical mediastinoscopy at our department, including 472 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. We developed three distinct prediction models for N2 lymph node station metastasis: one using standard statistical analysis, another utilizing an image processing deep learning algorithm with thoracic CT, and the third employing various machine learning methods with clinicopathological and radiological data. We compared diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity rates, as well as the F1-score of all models.

resultsLinear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, Gaussian naive Bayes, and artificial neural networks all surpassed 90% accuracy. The linear support vector machine demonstrated the highest performance, with an accuracy of 95.7%, an AUC of 93.5%, and an F1-score of 92%, respectively and outperformed the logistic regression-based statistical model, which reached an accuracy of 90.6% and an AUC of 85.7%.

conclusionMachine learning models outperformed standard statistical analysis models in predicting N2 lymph node metastasis. Implementing these machine learning prediction models might greatly improve the accuracy of mediastinal lymph node metastasis detection, thereby enhancing clinical decision making and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMediastinoscopyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesAccuracyArtificial intelligentLung neoplasmNeoplasm metastasisNeoplasm staging

Identifiers

PMID41053734
PMCPMC12502267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.