ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Machine learning-based prediction of N2 lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Redefining the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Accurate staging of mediastinal lymph nodes is a crucial step in determining appropriate treatment approaches. Current noninvasive diagnostic methods do not provide sufficient accuracy to confidently decide on surgery without histological confirmation. Our study aimed to develop a artificial intelligence model for the precise prediction of N2 lymph node metastasis.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1489 patients who underwent standard cervical mediastinoscopy at our department, including 472 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. We developed three distinct prediction models for N2 lymph node station metastasis: one using standard statistical analysis, another utilizing an image processing deep learning algorithm with thoracic CT, and the third employing various machine learning methods with clinicopathological and radiological data. We compared diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity rates, as well as the F1-score of all models.
resultsLinear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, Gaussian naive Bayes, and artificial neural networks all surpassed 90% accuracy. The linear support vector machine demonstrated the highest performance, with an accuracy of 95.7%, an AUC of 93.5%, and an F1-score of 92%, respectively and outperformed the logistic regression-based statistical model, which reached an accuracy of 90.6% and an AUC of 85.7%.
conclusionMachine learning models outperformed standard statistical analysis models in predicting N2 lymph node metastasis. Implementing these machine learning prediction models might greatly improve the accuracy of mediastinal lymph node metastasis detection, thereby enhancing clinical decision making and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.