ArticleBMC cancer2025
Differences in Sentinel lymph node biopsy outcomes and prognosis between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A Review of Epidemiology, Diagnostic Challenges, Targeted Therapies, and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has been recognized as a distinct biological subset within HER2-negative breast cancer. This study aimed to examine the differences in sentinel lymph node metastasis (SLNM) rates and prognosis between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers.
methodsThis retrospective study evaluated 965 estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy at Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital. Clinicopathological characteristics, SLNM rates, and prognostic outcomes were compared between patients with HER2-low and with HER2-zero breast cancers.
resultsThe SLNM rate was significantly higher in the HER2-low group than in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.039). However, disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), overall survival, and breast cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between the two groups. In subgroup analysis excluding macrometastases, DFS and RFI were significantly longer in the HER2-low breast cancer group.
conclusionHER2-low breast cancer exhibits a higher SLNM rate, suggesting unique biological behavior. However, its overall prognosis remains similar to that of HER2-zero breast cancer, with potential prognostic advantages in select subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.