SynthesisBMC public health2025
The constructs of health literacy in children: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gamified Assessment of Medication Literacy in School-Aged Children: Instrument Development and Validation Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Supporting Health Literacy in Youth: An Insight from Academics and Practitioners.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictors of Problematic Internet Use Among Gifted Children: The Role of Health Literacy and Health-Promoting Lifestyle Beliefs.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Readability of patient information leaflets for commonly used medicines in the UK, Germany and Türkiye: a cross-sectional document analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Doctor-child communication and caregivers' willingness to recommend hospital: a secondary analysis using pediatric patient experience data.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Building health-promoting school environments: a longitudinal qualitative study of the Explo'Santé program in France.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth literacy encompasses competencies enabling individuals to access, comprehend, evaluate, and use health information effectively. While research emphasizes its importance during childhood, limited consensus exists on health literacy conceptualization for children aged 9-12 years-a critical developmental period characterized by concrete operational thinking. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize key components of health literacy frameworks specifically used for children in this age group.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in 2024 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024588355). Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and ScienceOpen) were searched without temporal restrictions using terms related to "health literacy" and "children." Studies were included if they detailed health literacy conceptualization for children aged 9-12 years, were peer-reviewed English publications with accessible full-text, and demonstrated high methodological quality. Hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis was applied using Nutbeam's framework as theoretical foundation.
resultsFrom 11,586 initial records, 18 studies met inclusion criteria representing diverse geographic contexts (66.7% Western, 33.3% Eastern) and methodological approaches (35% qualitative, 24% quantitative, 41% mixed-methods). Four overarching themes emerged: [1] Skills (functional, interactive, and critical literacy competencies); [2] Teaching-learning processes (pedagogy, educator-learner dynamics, content delivery, learning environments, and assessment methods); [3] Contextual factors (socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic influences); and [4] Individual factors (psychological traits and cognitive abilities). While Nutbeam's tripartite model was referenced in 77% of studies, it required substantial adaptation for pediatric populations. Teaching-learning processes emerged as a novel dimension in 50% of studies, highlighting pedagogical approaches absent from adult-focused frameworks.
conclusionsHealth literacy in children aged 9-12 years extends beyond adult-centric models to encompass distinct developmental and educational dimensions. Teaching-learning processes emerged as a foundational component, emphasizing schools as critical platforms for health literacy development. Our findings support developing child-centered frameworks integrating cognitive development theory, educational pedagogy, and socio-ecological perspectives. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies, culturally responsive interventions, and child-specific assessment tools. This framework provides evidence-based guidance for developing age-appropriate health literacy interventions and assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.