Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053693›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

The constructs of health literacy in children: a systematic review.

Sara Zamani Bakhtiarvand, Zohreh Rahaei, Hossein Ali Sadeghian, Farhad Fatehi, Sepideh Soltani, Armin Zareiyan, Don Nutbeam

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara Zamani BakhtiarvandSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Education & Health promotion, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Zohreh RahaeiSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Education & Health promotion, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. z_rahayy@yahoo.com.
Hossein Ali SadeghianSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Education & Health promotion, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Farhad FatehiCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sepideh SoltaniYazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Armin ZareiyanResearch Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, Public Health Department, Nursing Faculty, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Don NutbeamSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Level 2, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy encompasses competencies enabling individuals to access, comprehend, evaluate, and use health information effectively. While research emphasizes its importance during childhood, limited consensus exists on health literacy conceptualization for children aged 9-12 years-a critical developmental period characterized by concrete operational thinking. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize key components of health literacy frameworks specifically used for children in this age group.

methodsA systematic review was conducted in 2024 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024588355). Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and ScienceOpen) were searched without temporal restrictions using terms related to "health literacy" and "children." Studies were included if they detailed health literacy conceptualization for children aged 9-12 years, were peer-reviewed English publications with accessible full-text, and demonstrated high methodological quality. Hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis was applied using Nutbeam's framework as theoretical foundation.

resultsFrom 11,586 initial records, 18 studies met inclusion criteria representing diverse geographic contexts (66.7% Western, 33.3% Eastern) and methodological approaches (35% qualitative, 24% quantitative, 41% mixed-methods). Four overarching themes emerged: [1] Skills (functional, interactive, and critical literacy competencies); [2] Teaching-learning processes (pedagogy, educator-learner dynamics, content delivery, learning environments, and assessment methods); [3] Contextual factors (socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic influences); and [4] Individual factors (psychological traits and cognitive abilities). While Nutbeam's tripartite model was referenced in 77% of studies, it required substantial adaptation for pediatric populations. Teaching-learning processes emerged as a novel dimension in 50% of studies, highlighting pedagogical approaches absent from adult-focused frameworks.

conclusionsHealth literacy in children aged 9-12 years extends beyond adult-centric models to encompass distinct developmental and educational dimensions. Teaching-learning processes emerged as a foundational component, emphasizing schools as critical platforms for health literacy development. Our findings support developing child-centered frameworks integrating cognitive development theory, educational pedagogy, and socio-ecological perspectives. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies, culturally responsive interventions, and child-specific assessment tools. This framework provides evidence-based guidance for developing age-appropriate health literacy interventions and assessment tools.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyChildHumansChildrenCognitive developmentHealth literacyPedagogyThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41053693
PMCPMC12502392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.