Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053578›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Assessment of physicians' ethical dilemmas and decision-making in emergency departments in resource-limited settings: a study of selected public hospitals in Sidama regional state, Ethiopia, 2024.

Sisay Tesfaye, Fikru Tadesse, Mekdes Shifeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sisay TesfayeFaculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, P.O. BOX 1560, Hawassa, Ethiopia. tesfayesisay4@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7199-9187
Fikru TadesseSchool of Nursing, Department of Nurse, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Mekdes ShifetaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthical dilemmas are the major issue in emergency departments in hospital settings. The difficulty of choice presents a challenge for doctors, patients, and patient families, and ethical decision-making becomes a problem. Since emergency therapy is different from other departments in that it requires immediate intervention to save lives, the patient’s unknown history, the limited resources available, family culture and/or beliefs, and the congested emergency department, there are also a number of ethical dilemmas. To best of our knowledge, there was no data on physician ethical dilemmas and decision making in the study area.

objectivesTo assess ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes in emergency departments from selected public hospitals in Sidama regional state, Ethiopia.

methodsDescriptive cross-sectional study conducted in public institutions with a standardized, self-administered questionnaire. And the study was done at selected seven public hospitals in Sidama region, Southern Ethiopia from Oct 2023 –May 2024. Self-administered prepared questionnaires were used for data collection from physicians working in emergency departments by convenient sampling. Data was coded, entered, and cleaned using Epi Data version 3.3.1 software. Errors related to inconsistency were verified using the data cleansing method and finally exported into SPSS version 24 software for analysis.

resultThe study included 274 physicians of which 207(75.5%) male and 67(24.5%) female. The majority of participants 164 (59.9%) were general practitioners and 185(81.9%) participants took clinical ethics (medical ethics). 156(56.9%) physicians often encounter limitations of resources that result in difficult choices, 150(54.7%) participants were sometimes encountered significant disagreement among healthcare personnel on continuing the treatment of the patient due to a lack of resource. From a total of 274 physicians 244(89.1%) have paid from their pocket, 77(28.1%) of physicians donated blood for their own patients. Physicians tried to use different strategies to solve ethical dilemmas like, 140(51.1%) of physicians talk with their colleagues and find the solution together. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Throughout their medical careers, physicians frequently encounter ethical dilemmas and struggle with emergency department decision-making. They often encounter limitations of resources, a patient’s (patient’s family) inability to pay that result in difficulty in treating patients at emergency department. As per the study there was no uniform and enough ethical training how to handle different ethical dilemmas. Hospitals should endeavour to tackle hospital resource constraint, which is the primary cause of ethical dilemmas, and develop guidelines to handle ethical issues. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmergency Service, HospitalEthical DilemmasHospitals, PublicPhysiciansAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResource-Limited SettingsSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision-makingEmergency departmentsEthical dilemmasPhysiciansPublic hospitals

Identifiers

PMID41053578
PMCPMC12502443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.