Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053574›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Beyond the guidelines: participants' perspectives on sustained MPDSR implementation in Nigeria, North Macedonia, and Sri Lanka.

Francesca Palestra, Claudia Hanson, Eleonora Mognato, Shittu Oladapo, Kapila Jayaratne, Gligor Tofoski, Merlin Willcox, Pius Okong, Allisyn Moran, Matthews Mathai and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesca PalestraDepartment of Global Public Health (GPH), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. francesca.palestra@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8619-1201
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health (GPH), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eleonora MognatoMédecins Sans Frontières, Rome, Italy.
Shittu OladapoCollege of Medicine, Federal University of Health Sciences, Otukpo, Nigeria.
Kapila JayaratneDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Gligor TofoskiUniversity Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University St. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Merlin WillcoxPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Pius OkongMK Postgraduate School, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda.
Allisyn MoranDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Aging, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Matthews MathaiConsultant in Global Maternal and Perinatal Health, St John's, NF, Canada.
Pamela Mazzocato *Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME) Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Bergstrom *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) was developed as a quality improvement intervention to reduce preventable maternal and newborn deaths and stillbirths. To gain deeper insight into the key components enabling sustained MPDSR implementation, we examined how MPDSR systems are organized and function in Nigeria, North Macedonia, and Sri Lanka.

methodsWe conducted 61 interviews with participants who were knowledgeable about the MPDSR system of their country, including policymakers, healthcare providers, and public health officials, at the national, subnational and facility levels. We applied content analysis to inductively identify themes and categories.

resultsOur findings suggest that participants perceive the goal of MPDSR as going beyond local quality improvement to encompass broader healthcare system strengthening. Four enabling components supporting sustained implementation were identified in all three countries: 1. coordination of the MPDSR “programme” through committees across levels; 2. adoption and integration of a data management and analysis system; 3. a confidential, nonpunitive approach supported by committed leadership; and 4. a multilevel, country-specific response strategy integrated with a broader health system strengthening. Sri Lanka demonstrated a highly centralized and structured approach, whereas Nigeria’s federal system showcased more diverse, multilevel stakeholder engagement. North Macedonia’s facility-based approach focused on the immediate implementation of quality improvements.

conclusionsThe findings reveal that a structured, multilevel approach that is interconnected with the broader health system is supporting sustained MPDSR implementation. The potential of MPDSR as a health system programme that goes beyond facility-level mortality reduction links to an integrated health system strengthening and accountability at multiple levels.

Indexed as

Maternal DeathPerinatal DeathPopulation SurveillanceQuality ImprovementFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNigeriaPregnancyRepublic of North MacedoniaSri LankaStillbirthDeath reviewMaternal and perinatal death surveillance and responseMaternal healthNewborn healthQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID41053574
PMCPMC12498454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.