ArticleBMC primary care2025
Adopting self-measured blood pressure monitoring in underserved primary care settings: a qualitative study using customer discovery and value proposition principles.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Implementing a Clinical Integration Package to Support Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite being recommended in clinical practice guidelines as an effective strategy to control blood pressure, self-measured blood pressure monitoring (SMBP) adoption in the US remains low with clear disparities among underserved patients. Our objective was to develop a prototype SMBP Clinical Integration Package to support the use of standard, cost-effective SMBP devices requiring minimal technology investment for healthcare systems.
methodsThe I-Corps™ methodology, designed to promote the successful adoption of interventions, was used to create a value proposition and to conduct customer discovery interviews with hypertension patients, primary care providers, and healthcare system leaders from a Midwestern healthcare system. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis methods. Emerging themes were used to revise the value proposition, create the minimum viable product, and propose an SMBP intervention to increase its adoption in primary care.
resultsA total of 28 interviews were conducted. Six themes emerged including (1) access to a blood pressure device with the appropriate cuff size (2), Self-efficacy in performing SMBP (3), motivation to perform SMBP (4), an acceptable pathway to share SMBP readings with the care team (5), processes to document and address SMBP readings, and (6) unmet social needs. Key findings from these interviews suggest the need for an intervention that addresses multifaceted emerging barriers at the patient, provider, and health system levels.
conclusionsThe I-Corps™ methodology led to identifying the clinical problem relevant to the SMBP adoption in low resource primary care settings where patients cannot afford enhanced SMBP devices and health systems do not have the resources to invest in high-cost technology solutions. The proposed ASPIRE Clinical Integration Package incorporates the identified minimum valuable product and includes supporting the patient in completing SMBP readings at home, documenting the readings in an acceptable method to the patient, sharing them with the care team to be incorporated into the treatment plan, and addressing the patient's unmet social needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.