Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053530›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

The paradise-24 questionnaire: a review of language versions, psychometric evidence, and application in brain disorder.

Luana Karoline Castro Silva, Lidiane Andrea Oliveira Lima, Carla Sabariego, Luana Wendy de Oliveira Sousa, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luana Karoline Castro SilvaFederal University of Ceará, Postgraduate Program of Public Health, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. luanacastro96@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-5161
Lidiane Andrea Oliveira LimaFederal University of Ceará, Postgraduate Program of Physiotherapy and Functioning, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-8894
Carla SabariegoUniversity of Lucerne, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-0177
Luana Wendy de Oliveira SousaFederal University of Ceará, Postgraduate Program of Physiotherapy and Functioning, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9227-4694
Shamyr Sulyvan de CastroFederal University of Ceará, Postgraduate Program of Public Health, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-7899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high prevalence of brain disorders and their impact on populations requires a better understanding of how affected individuals function daily. PARADISE-24, a tool based on the biopsychosocial model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), was designed to assess the impact of brain disorders. However, information on translations, psychometric properties, and its use remains limited.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to provide an overview of PARADISE-24 translations, psychometric properties, and the brain disorders in which it has been applied as an assessment tool.

methodsThe PRISMA statement guidelines informed the reporting. A structured literature search was performed until January 2025 in PubMed, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS. Two reviewers independently retrieved studies. The studies' methodological quality and the quality of evidence were stated.

resultsFrom 919 identified studies, twelve articles were included. Five evaluated psychometric measures and seven used PARADISE-24 to identify impacts in individuals with multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, migraine, stroke, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and people with substance use disorders. The results report high level of evidence in internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness, and considered moderate evidence available in reliability due to the doubtful methodological quality of the studies. Only one translated version was found.

conclusionAlthough the PARADISE-24 questionnaire is one of the first and only that assesses the impact of brain disorders based on the ICF, this questionnaire had only four measurement properties evaluated. More validation studies are needed, as well as encouragement for translating the PARADISE-24 into other languages.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesPsychometricsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthNervous System DiseasesPsychometricsPsychosocial Functioning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.