ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
A critical review on neurodegenerative biomarker diagnostics: where is the field heading to?
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood-based multiplex nanobiosensing of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: from nanoengineered ınterfaces to clinical translation.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- Proteostasis (in)action: the role of co-pathologies in neurodegenerative disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Circulating miRNA as diagnostic tools for gynecological diseases and their applications in biosensor development.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDD), a collection of disorders with different underlying causes and clinical presentations, are recognized as a major area of concern of our society today. The most common NDD are Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington's disease, each one of them being characterized by the progressive degradation of nerve cells and accumulation of misfolded and aggregated proteins in the affected brain region. Diagnosing NDD is challenging, due to the heterogeneity of the disease and the overlap of symptoms. Yet, early detection and accurate diagnosis are crucial for effective NDD management. With the emergence of disease-modifying therapies for AD, monitoring disease progression and treatment success is becoming essential. The future of NND diagnostics is focusing on developing less invasive, cost-effective strategies that enable early NDD identification and detection with improved patient outcomes. The integration of biotechnology and nanotechnology is seen as crucial for advancing the analytical science aspect of NDD. The creation of these innovative tools and methodologies is on the verge of enabling new possibilities for clinical diagnostics, but is also faced with several hurdles that will be critically evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41053519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.