Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Updated screening criteria for enhanced oil recovery methods and their application to the T oilfield in eastern Mongolia.

Anuudari Arvis, Baehyun Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anuudari ArvisDepartment of Climate and Energy Systems Engineering, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.
Baehyun MinDepartment of Climate and Energy Systems Engineering, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea. bhmin01@ewha.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement RS-2022-00143644Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning 20212010200010National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1A6A1A08025520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) plays a vital role in maximizing oil production from depleting reservoirs. As EOR technologies advance, updating screening criteria is essential to evaluate and recommend suitable EOR methods for target reservoirs. This study aims to establish updated screening criteria to identify the most effective EOR methods based on specific reservoir characteristics. A structured selection approach facilitates the evaluation of advanced EOR technologies to ensure the suitability for particular reservoirs while optimizing recovery processes and improving overall efficiency. To demonstrate this approach in practice, we present a case study using field data collected from the T oilfield in Mongolia. The estimated recovery factor based on primary and secondary recovery is in the range of 10% to 17%. Therefore, the field development plan considers the application of EOR to the T oilfield. An integrated methodology that combines EOR screening with score assignment is applied to provide a comprehensive evaluation of potential EOR technologies. The results show that the miscible carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR)Reservoir evaluationScore assignmentScreening criteriaT oilfield in mongolia

Identifiers

PMID41053502
PMCPMC12500891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.