Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053456›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Artificial intelligence -assisted tinnitus support with ChatGPT-4.

Elvin Alaskarov, Aynur Aliyeva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Tinnitus in urban settings: insights into lifestyle and medical factors from the Hamburg City Health Study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Turing problems in otolaryngology: a scoping review of the principal challenges of artificial ıntelligence and large language models.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Echoes of immunity: exploring hidden signals in sudden hearing loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elvin AlaskarovDepartment of Otolaryngology, Istanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice and Research Center Esenler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. ealaskarov@medipol.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-0062
Aynur AliyevaThe Neuroscience Doctoral Program, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey. dr.aynuraliyeva86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-4261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT-4, an advanced AI language model, in delivering accurate, clear, and relevant information to patients managing tinnitus, especially in settings with limited healthcare access.

methodsChatGPT-4 was presented with ten common tinnitus-related Questions, guided by the 2014 American Academy of Otolaryngology guidelines. Ten ENT specialists rated its responses across multiple metrics using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses assessed accuracy, reliability, and overall response quality.

resultsChatGPT-4 demonstrated high accuracy (mean = 85.5%, SD = 5.77), relevance (mean = 90.13%, SD = 5.00), and clarity (mean = 83.93%, SD = 5.13) across responses. Response times were consistently efficient (mean = 84.2%, SD = 5.28). Sensitivity and specificity were estimated at 90% and 95%, respectively. Inter-rater reliability analysis yielded moderate to substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.65-0.78), and effect size analysis indicated a large impact.

conclusionChatGPT-4 provides accurate, timely, and patient-friendly information for tinnitus care, supporting its potential as an adjunct to conventional patient education. This AI tool could bridge gaps in healthcare access, particularly in resource-limited settings, enhancing patient support through accessible and reliable guidance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTinnitusGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansOtolaryngologyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAI healthcareChatGPT-4ENTPatient supportTinnitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.