Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053447›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2025

Generative artificial intelligence in medicine.

Zhen Ling Teo, Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Kabilan Elangovan, Haoran Cheng, Prasanth Moova, Brian Soetikno, Christopher Nielsen, Andreas Pollreisz, Darren Shu Jeng Ting, Robert J T Morris and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07640906 (A Multicenter Comparative Study Evaluating the Impact of an AI-Assisted Chest CT Reporting System on Real-world Radiologist Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07640906 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Comparative Study Evaluating the Impact of an AI-Assisted Chest CT Reporting System on Real-world Radiologist Performance: The DOUBLE-ACE Study

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled75ConditionsThoracic Diseases, Chest CT Scan, Artificial Intelligence (AI) in DiagnosisArmsAn AI-assisted reporting system integrated into the clinical workflow, providing automated draft generation to assist with chest CT interpretation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. End-to-End PET/CT Interpretation and Quantification with an LLM-Orchestrated AI Agent: A Real-World Pilot Study.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. What Are Physicians For? How Psychiatry's Competencies Endure Into the Age of AI.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhen Ling Teo *Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3443-8601
Arun James Thirunavukarasu *Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8968-4768
Kabilan ElangovanSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Haoran ChengSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Prasanth MoovaSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Brian SoetiknoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.
Christopher NielsenCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Andreas PollreiszSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Darren Shu Jeng TingSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Robert J T MorrisMinistry of Health (MOH) Office for Healthcare Transformation, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-2393
Nigam H ShahDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-7158
Curtis P LanglotzDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-8051
Daniel Shu Wei TingSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore. daniel.ting@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) H20C6a0032MOH | National Medical Research Council (NMRC) MOH-000655-00; MOH-001014-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) can automate a growing number of biomedical tasks, ranging from clinical decision support to design and analysis of research studies. GAI uses machine learning and transformer model architectures to generate useful text, images and sound data in response to user queries. While previous biomedical deep-learning applications have used general-purpose datasets and enormous volumes of labeled data for training, evidence now suggests that GAI models may perform better while requiring less training data-for example, using smaller, domain-specific datasets. Moreover, AI techniques have progressed from fully supervised training to less label-intensive approaches, such as weakly supervised or unsupervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. Recent iterations of GAI, such as agents, mixture-of-expert models and reasoning models, have further extended their capabilities to assist with complex and multistage tasks. Here, we provide an overview of recent technical advancements in GAI. We explore the potential of the latest generation of models to improve healthcare for clinicians and patients, and discuss validation approaches using specific examples to illustrate challenges and opportunities for further work.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedicineDeep LearningGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.