Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Antihypertensive treatment effect of two dual therapies according to sodium sensitivity.
Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond "One-Size-Fits-All": Deconstructing the Hormonal Determinants of Sodium Sensitivity in Treated Hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy of two dual antihypertensive therapies, the amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations, according to sodium sensitivity risk (SSR) as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In a multi-center, randomized, actively-controlled, parallel-group trial, patients with a clinic systolic/diastolic BP of 140 to 179/90 to 109 mmHg while on benazepril 10 mg daily monotherapy, received 24-week antihypertensive treatment with amlodipine/benazepril 5/10 mg (n = 213) or benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide 10/12.5 mg (n = 212). SSR was assessed with two 24-h ABPM parameters, BP dipper status at night and 24-h mean heart rate. The amlodipine/benazepril combination, compared with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combination, showed greater BP lowering effect in 304 patients with low/intermediate SSR, but smaller BP lowering effect in 121 patients with high SSR, with significant (P ≤ 0.046) interaction for 24-h, daytime and morning systolic BP. Indeed, in comparison with the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group, 24-h and daytime systolic BP reductions in the amlodipine/benazepril group were 4.19 and 5.17 mmHg, respectively, greater in patients with low/intermediate SSR, while morning systolic BP reductions was 10.8 mmHg smaller in patients with high SSR. Similar trends were observed for the other systolic BP measurements and diastolic BP measurements, although statistical significance was not attained (P ≥ 0.069). Sensitivity analysis in 367 patients with sustained hypertension was confirmatory. In conclusion, the antihypertensive treatment effect of the amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations was dependent on SSR as assessed by ABPM, with the former combination being more efficacious in patients with low/intermediate SSR, but less efficacious in patients with high SSR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41053442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.