ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Connectome-based markers predict the sub-types of frontotemporal dementia.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) presents a complex spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders, encompassing distinct subtypes with varied clinical manifestations. This study investigates alterations in brain module organization associated with FTD subtypes using connectome analysis, aiming to identify potential biomarkers and enhance subtype prediction. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained from 41 individuals with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (BV-FTD), 32 with semantic variant frontotemporal dementia (SV-FTD), 28 with progressive non-fluent aphasia frontotemporal dementia (PNFA-FTD), and 94 healthy controls. Individual functional brain networks were constructed at the voxel level and binarized based on density thresholds. Modular segregation index (MSI) and participation coefficient (PC) were calculated to assess module integrity and identify regions with altered nodal properties. The relationship between modular measures and clinical scores was examined, and machine learning models were developed for subtype prediction. Both BV-FTD and SV-FTD groups exhibited decreased MSI in the subcortical module (SUB), default mode network (DMN), and ventral attention network (VAN) compared to healthy controls. Additionally, BV-FTD specifically displayed disrupted frontoparietal network (FPN) integrity compared to other FTD subtypes and controls. All FTD subtypes showed increased PC values in the insular region and reduced connections between the insular and VAN/FPN compared to controls. Moreover, significant associations between specific network alterations and clinical variables were observed. Machine learning models utilizing these matrices achieved high performance in differentiating FTD subtypes. This pilot study reveals diverse brain module organization across FTD subtypes, shedding light on both shared and distinct neurobiological underpinnings of the disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41053432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.