Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053393›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

Development, optimization, and prototyping of a simplified sit-stand mechanism for lower limb impairments.

Subin P George, Mervin Joe Thomas, Meby Mathew, Naveen Gangadharan, Arun K Varghese

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Subin P GeorgeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sastra Deemed University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, 613401, India. subinpgeorge1985@gmail.com.
Mervin Joe ThomasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Karnataka, Surathkal, 575025, Karnataka, India.
Meby MathewDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Amal Jyothi College of Engineering, Koovappally City, Kerala, 686518, India. mebymathew@amaljyothi.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-4893
Naveen GangadharanDepartment of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600036, India.
Arun K VargheseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Saintgits College of Engineering, Kottayam, Kerala, 686532, India.

Funding

Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment 16-1/2015-DD-III
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sit-stand device for rehabilitation should be simple in its design, easy to manufacture, and convenient for individuals with mobility impairments to use. This paper proposes a design framework and prototyping process for developing an assisted sit-to-stand mechanism tailored to the specific limitations faced by individuals with lower limb impairments. The study incorporates a functional kinematic and kinetic design to ensure the mechanism's usability across a diverse range of individuals. Recognizing the critical challenges faced by individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and subsequent paralysis, the design philosophy integrates considerations specifically aimed at this population. A simplified circular design trajectory is presented for individuals with muscle paralysis, focusing on the synthesis of an electrically actuated mechanism. A four-bar linkage is modeled to represent the mechanism in the sagittal plane. The functional attributes of the device are determined, and kinematic synthesis is performed to ensure comfort during the sit-to-stand motion. This is achieved by minimizing the actuator's travel distance during the lift. The velocity and acceleration profiles of the linear actuator are determined after applying boundary conditions. An optimal configuration is selected based on minimizing the displacement of the electric actuator. A human body model based on a 50th percentile male was developed to simulate a motion study of the sit-stand and validate the trajectory using the motion study module in SOLIDWORKS™. An optimum sit-to-stand linkage design was synthesized, and the corresponding prototype was fabricated. The independent anthropometric dimensions on which the design depends are the thigh length and the weight. The sagittal linkages for lifting were calculated and tested through simulation with a human body model to replicate the sit-to-stand movement. The prototype was evaluated on an able-bodied individual. A key design feature was the repositioning of support from the armpit to the hip, thereby reducing user discomfort and improving ergonomics. The motion study revealed that the trajectory of the hip joint (H-point) followed a nearly circular curvature. Stability analysis using a mannequin confirmed a static stability margin of 1 and showed that the device would tip forward only if the deceleration exceeded 35.8 m/s

Indexed as

Lower ExtremitySitting PositionStanding PositionBiomechanical PhenomenaEquipment DesignHumansMaleSpinal Cord InjuriesFour-bar linkageKinematic synthesisParaplegicsPrototype fabricationRehabilitationSit-to-stand deviceSpinal cord injury (SCI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.