ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Social perceptions of misinformation sources and memory.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on the misinformation effect has shown that individuals' memories can be influenced by postevent misinformation. However, individuals do not passively receive such misinformation; instead, they may form perceptions about its sources. This study was the first to examine the relationship between individuals' social perceptions of misinformation sources and their susceptibility to postevent misinformation, considering different types of misinformation in three preregistered studies. Participants first learned a narrative paragraph in preparation for an interview. They then answered questions under one of three conditions: neutral (no misinformation), explicit misinformation, or pragmatic implication misinformation. Participants rated the interviewers who prepared the questions (Study 1 and Study 2) or asked the questions in a video (Study 3) on competence, sociability, morality, and overall perception. Memory accuracies during the direct interaction and subsequent cued recall were analyzed alongside these social perception ratings. Participants gave lower social perception ratings to sources presenting explicit misinformation compared with those in neutral and pragmatic misinformation conditions. However, social perception ratings were not associated with memory accuracies. Regardless of the type of misinformation, exposure to misinformation increased the likelihood of making corresponding misinformation errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41053388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.