ArticleScientific reports2025
Classifying metal passivity from EIS using interpretable machine learning with minimal data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a data-efficient machine learning framework for diagnosing degradation of passive metallic surfaces using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). Passive metals such as stainless steels and titanium alloys rely on nanoscale oxide layers for corrosion resistance, critical in applications from implants to infrastructure. Ensuring their passivity is essential but remains difficult to assess without expert input. We develop an expert-free pipeline combining input normalization, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and a k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) classifier trained on representative experimental EIS spectra for a small set of well-separated classes linked to distinct passivation states. The choice of preprocessing is critical: normalization followed by PCA enabled optimal class separation and confident predictions, whereas raw spectra with PCA or full-spectra inputs yielded low clustering scores and classification probabilities. To confirm robustness, we also tested a shallow neural network (NN) classifier on the same PCA-reduced input, which produced comparable but slightly less confident predictions than k-NN. The training dataset was comprised of five classes including abraded (ABR), cold-rolled (INT), mirror-polished (POL), citric (CPAS) and nitric acid (NPAS) passivated states on AISI 304 stainless steel. The external validation set included impedance spectra from distinct samples and literature-reported datasets spanning crevice zones, welds, mechanically abraded regions, as-received materials, and passive surfaces in low corrosivity media. The results supports the viability of interpretable, label-efficient classification of EIS spectra for corrosion diagnostics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.