Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053348›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Classifying metal passivity from EIS using interpretable machine learning with minimal data.

Sanja Martinez, Izabela Martinez, Tomislav Ratković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanja MartinezFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. sanja.martinez@fkit.unizg.hr.
Izabela MartinezFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 5, 10002, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav RatkovićFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

EU - Next Generation EU NPOO.C3.2.R3-I1.04.0324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a data-efficient machine learning framework for diagnosing degradation of passive metallic surfaces using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). Passive metals such as stainless steels and titanium alloys rely on nanoscale oxide layers for corrosion resistance, critical in applications from implants to infrastructure. Ensuring their passivity is essential but remains difficult to assess without expert input. We develop an expert-free pipeline combining input normalization, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and a k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) classifier trained on representative experimental EIS spectra for a small set of well-separated classes linked to distinct passivation states. The choice of preprocessing is critical: normalization followed by PCA enabled optimal class separation and confident predictions, whereas raw spectra with PCA or full-spectra inputs yielded low clustering scores and classification probabilities. To confirm robustness, we also tested a shallow neural network (NN) classifier on the same PCA-reduced input, which produced comparable but slightly less confident predictions than k-NN. The training dataset was comprised of five classes including abraded (ABR), cold-rolled (INT), mirror-polished (POL), citric (CPAS) and nitric acid (NPAS) passivated states on AISI 304 stainless steel. The external validation set included impedance spectra from distinct samples and literature-reported datasets spanning crevice zones, welds, mechanically abraded regions, as-received materials, and passive surfaces in low corrosivity media. The results supports the viability of interpretable, label-efficient classification of EIS spectra for corrosion diagnostics.

Identifiers

PMID41053348
PMCPMC12500899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.