Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053338›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Trends in the homogenization of macromoth assemblages (2016-2023) in a Seoul City park.

Sei-Woong Choi, Sung-Soo Kim, Jae-Young Lee, Jaesang Noh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sei-Woong ChoiDepartment of Environmental Education, Mokpo National University, Muan, 58554, Korea. choisw@mokpo.ac.kr.
Sung-Soo KimResearch Institute for East Asian Environment and Biology, Seoul, 05264, Korea.
Jae-Young LeeDepartment of Environmental Education, Mokpo National University, Muan, 58554, Korea.
Jaesang NohNational Institute of Ecology, Seocheon, 33657, Chungnam, Korea.

Funding

National Institute of Ecology NIE-B-2024-02National Research Foundation of Korea RS 2023-00272745National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00413166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a Long-Term Ecological Network project in Korea, we conducted monthly macromoth sampling from May to October, 2016-2023, in Namsan Park, Seoul, at three permanent plots representing dominant tree communities: Quercus mongolica, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Pinus densiflora forests. Over eight years, we recorded 3,486 individuals from 283 species in 11 families. In total, 351 macromoth species from 13 families were documented in the city park, including 212 newly discovered species and 68 previously recorded species now disappearing. Species richness and abundance varied among the three forest types, with the Q. mongolica forest showing the highest values in both species and individuals. Overall species richness showed a nonsignificant decline, and auto regressive integrated moving average models predicted ongoing fluctuations in richness and a rising trend in abundance in the coming years. Macromoth assemblages in Namsan exhibited distinct clustering by forest type, with consistent distribution of body size groups emphasized throughout the study. Furthermore, relatively high faunal turnover within forests, combined with minimal annual variation, suggests a trend toward homogenization of macromoth assemblages across forest types. This pattern appears to be influenced by the city park's isolation, which may limit species dispersal and contribute to localized faunal differentiation.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsEcosystemForestsParks, RecreationalPinusQuercusRepublic of KoreaSeoulTreesDiversityFaunal changeHerbivoresHomogenizationUrban forest

Identifiers

PMID41053338
PMCPMC12501232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.