Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053329›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improving bovine disease detection through multilabel classification.

Ghalib Nadeem, Muhammad Fahim Ul Haque, Hameeza Ahmed, Mansoor Ebrahim, Sadique Ahmad, Isabel de la Torre Díez, Hanaa A Abdallah, Abdelhamied A Ateya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghalib NadeemDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iqra University, Karachi, 75500, Pakistan.
Muhammad Fahim Ul HaqueDepartment of Telecommunications Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Hameeza AhmedDepartment of Computer and Information Systems Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Mansoor EbrahimFaculty of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Iqra University, Karachi, 75500, Pakistan.
Sadique AhmadEIAS Data Science Lab, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia.
Isabel de la Torre DíezDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Hanaa A AbdallahDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Abdelhamied A AteyaEIAS Data Science Lab, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia. aateya@psu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

R1.C1: The dairy industry is a cornerstone of global food production and economic development; yet, its productivity is frequently hindered by common bovine health issues, including lameness, mastitis, metritis, and foot-and-mouth disease. These conditions not only affect milk yield but also pose significant challenges to maintaining animal welfare, highlighting the urgent need for intelligent, data-driven monitoring systems. R1.C2: In response to this critical need, this research proposes a machine learning (ML)-based framework for the early detection of such bovine events and diseases through multi-label classification. R1.C3: The system identifies estrus, calving, lameness, mastitis, and acidosis by analyzing key behavioral metrics derived from sensor-based monitoring, including feeding duration, resting periods, locomotion patterns, and aggregated activity data. R1.C4: In the context of multi-label bovine disease prediction, the combination of SMOTE and Classifier Chains is particularly crucial and synergistic due to the nature of the data and the interdependent relationships among the labels. R1.C5: The system was tested using a large dataset of 2.35 million records of livestock behavioral metrics. R1.C6: Among the six machine learning models investigated, the classifier chain configuration utilizing an Extra Tree Classifier consistently demonstrated superior performance, achieving a remarkable 97% subset accuracy, 96% recall, 95% precision, 96% F1-score, and a minimal Hamming loss of 0.04. Therefore, it is evident that classifier chains combined with oversampling techniques can capture label correlations and improve prediction performance compared to standard binary relevance approaches.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesAnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleMachine LearningBehavioral data analysisBovine disease detectionClassifier chains modelSMOTE

Identifiers

PMID41053329
PMCPMC12501033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.