ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Anatomical and surgical insights into double mandibular osteotomy with segmental rotation for parapharyngeal space and infratemporal fossa access.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary objective was to quantify the additional exposure of the distal cervical internal carotid artery achieved by double mandibular osteotomy. The secondary objective was to assess the technical feasibility by identifying key anatomical landmarks and defining the optimal operative steps.
methodsTwenty dissections were performed on formalin-embalmed cadavers. The internal carotid artery exposure was measured before and after double mandibular osteotomy, in conjunction with sectioning of the stylohyoid, styloglossus, and stylopharyngeus muscles, as well as resection of the styloid process. Mean values between the two groups were compared using an independent two-sample Student’s t-test.
resultsThe transcervical approach exposed 33.85 mm (± 5.8 mm) of the internal carotid artery. After double osteotomy, a mean exposure of 67.75 mm (± 5.1 mm) was achieved, representing an increase of 33.9 mm. A statistically significant difference between group means was observed (t = –19.43, p < 0.05; 2.45 × 10⁻21), supporting rejection of the null hypothesis.
conclusionDouble mandibular osteotomy offers an effective alternative for accessing the parapharyngeal space and infratemporal fossa, facilitating tumor resection and carotid interventions. This technique balances surgical accessibility with preservation of surrounding structures, resulting in an acceptable level of morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41053319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.