Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053303›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Urban boundaries are an underexplored frontier for ecological restoration.

Luciana Schwandner Ferreira, Gabriela di Giulio, Rafael Barreiro Chaves, Artur Lupinetti-Cunha, Denise Duarte, Nathália Nascimento, Patricia Ruggiero, Lucia Sousa E Silva, Rodrigo Antonio Braga Moraes Victor, Jean Paul Metzger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luciana Schwandner FerreiraInstitute of Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. luciana.swf@usp.br.
Gabriela di GiulioInstitute of Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rafael Barreiro ChavesEnvironmental Research Institute, Secretariat for Environment, Infrastructure and Logistics of the State of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Artur Lupinetti-CunhaDepartment of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Denise DuarteDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Urbanism, and Design, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nathália NascimentoDepartment of Forest Sciences, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Patricia RuggieroInstitute of Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lucia Sousa E SilvaSecretariat for Environment, Infrastructure and Logistics of the State of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rodrigo Antonio Braga Moraes VictorSão Paulo Forest Foundation, Secretariat for Environment, Infrastructure and Logistics of the State of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jean Paul MetzgerInstitute of Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/06694-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/06504-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/07415-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/08401-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/09161-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration of degraded ecosystems is crucial for addressing climate, biodiversity, and health challenges. The benefits of these restorations are amplified when implemented closer to urban populations, particularly for climate adaptation and human health. This study investigated the potential of urban areas for forest restoration, introducing a novel distinction between dense urban areas and urban boundaries (peripheral zones of urban centers), and comparing their dynamics to rural areas. We analyzed three decades of deforestation and regeneration dynamics in Brazil, quantifying and mapping land-use transitions to assess restoration potential. Results show that forest transition has already occurred across all the different types of areas considered. Urban boundaries exhibited highly dynamic land use and high regeneration rates despite limited policy support. The landscape dynamics and the presence of environmentally risky areas reveal that urban boundaries contain significant areas that hold potential for restoration, which could significantly contribute to achieving national or subnational restoration targets. Integrating restoration into urban boundary planning offers both ecological and social benefits to a substantial portion of the population. Our findings reveal a missed opportunity to extend restoration efforts beyond the traditionally targeted rural areas, positioning urban boundaries as key areas for innovative land-use strategies and restoration initiatives.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationBiodiversityBrazilCitiesForestsHumansClimate change adaptationNature-based solutionUrban ecosystem services.Urban forest restoration

Identifiers

PMID41053303
PMCPMC12500993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.