ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative efficacy of biologically and chemically synthesized nickel oxide nanoparticles for catalytic degradation of dyes and wastewater treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions of microbial biofilms with metal nanoparticles in the context of bioremediation.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Eco-Friendly Synthesis ofBioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized using chemical and biological methods to evaluate their photocatalytic efficiency in degrading organic pollutants. The NiO-NPs were characterized by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and zeta potential analysis. Their photocatalytic activity was tested using methylene blue (MB) and 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) as model pollutants under visible light irradiation. Biosynthesized NiO-NPs exhibited higher photocatalytic activity and faster degradation rates. The biosynthesized NiO-NPs decolorized MB dye by 90% in 1 min, while chemically synthesized NPs required 5 min. Additionally, biosynthesized NiO-NPs degraded 4-NP more efficiently, achieving 65% decolorization in 25 min. The photocatalytic potential of the NiO-NPs was further demonstrated by the degradation of azo dyes, including reactive red-120, reactive black-5, brilliant yellow, and brilliant blue-R. In dye-loaded textile wastewater, NiO-NPs-B and NiO-NPs-C decolorized 84.8 ± 4.7% and 67.2 ± 3.4% of added RB5, and 70.3 ± 5.0% and 56.5 ± 2.3% of added RR120, respectively. Additionally, NiO-NPs-B removed 62.4 ± 3.7% of COD from wastewater spiked with RB5, while NiO-NPs-C removed 57.1 ± 3.3%. These findings suggest that biogenic NiO-NPs are highly efficient photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation, offering a promising alternative to conventional chemical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.