Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-experts decision support system for recycling of waste material using some circular pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead means.

Kifayat Ullah, Zeeshan Ahmad, Ewa Rak, Saeid Jafari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kifayat UllahDepartment of Mathematics, Riphah International University (Lahore Campus), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Zeeshan AhmadDepartment of Mathematics, Riphah International University (Lahore Campus), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Ewa RakFaculty of Exact and Technical Sciences, Institute of Mathematics, University of Rzeszów, Pigonia 1, Rzeszów, 35-310, Poland. erak@ur.edu.pl.
Saeid JafariCollege of Vestsjaelland South, Herrestraede 11, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tackles the critical challenge of waste material recycling, which is worsened by the growing global population and the necessity for efficient recycling processes. To address this issue, we introduce a pioneering approach that leverages circular Pythagorean fuzzy set theory, a sophisticated extension of fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy information. By formulating Muirhead mean and dual Muirhead mean aggregation operators within this framework, we facilitate structured and intelligent decision-making for assessing waste recycling alternatives. Our methodology and algorithm for multi-criteria group decision-making problems are showcased through a practical example, highlighting the efficacy and dependability of our approach. This research makes a significant contribution to the development of more efficient waste recycling processes and informed decision-making. The proposed approach enables decision-makers to evaluate waste recycling alternatives more comprehensively and systematically, taking into account multiple criteria and stakeholder perspectives. The findings of this study have important implications for policymakers, waste management professionals, and stakeholders seeking to improve waste recycling practices and reduce environmental impacts. By providing a more effective and reliable decision-making framework, this research aims to support the development of sustainable waste management systems. A sensitivity analysis illustrates the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed work. Finally, we adopted the comparative study and highlighted the advantages of defined work.

Indexed as

Aggregation operatorsCircular pythagorean fuzzy setMulti-criteria group decision-making processRecycling of waste material

Identifiers

PMID41053286
PMCPMC12501055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.