ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Personalised modelling of routine variability and affective states.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal smartphone sensor data provide rich insights into real-world behavioural patterns associated with anxiety and depression symptoms. We propose that variability in daily routines across life aspects may act as a personalised digital marker, linking behaviours to self-reported affective states. Using non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF), we decomposed mobile sensing data into individual-specific routines and their weekly variability. Generalised linear models (GLMs) were built per individual to associate variability from specific sensing categories with anxiety or depression states. Using a large language model (LLM; GPT-4o), we translated the modelling results into more accessible language that potentially helps individuals engage with their own routine phenotypes for self-regulation insights. Population-level grouping of GLMs revealed significant between-group differences in mental health measures. The LLM output shows a potential to uncover personalised behavioural patterns and support self-understanding of mood-related drivers. This approach may also inform group-based interventions by identifying individuals likely to benefit from shared treatment strategies based on routine similarity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.