Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053266›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Insights from terrain influence on gamma dose rate variability in lower Shivalik Himalayas.

Prakhar Singh, Ankur Kumar, O P Nautiyal, Sandeep Singh, Devendra Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prakhar SinghDepartment of Applied Science (Physics), FET, Gurukul Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India, 249404.
Ankur KumarDepartment of Physics, Sri Dev Suman Uttarakhand University Gopeshwar, Chamoli, India, Uttarakhand, 246401.
O P NautiyalUttarakhand State Council for Science and Technology (UCOST), Vigyan Dham, Jhajhra, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, 248007.
Sandeep SinghDepartment of Applied Science (Physics), FET, Gurukul Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India, 249404.
Devendra SinghDepartment of Applied Science (Physics), FET, Gurukul Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India, 249404. drdevendrasingh81@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on assessing how natural background radiation levels vary due to spontaneous gamma emissions from the terrain of the Haridwar district. Gamma radiation levels are influenced by a mix of environmental and structural factors. Outdoor radiation is closely connected to soil composition and geology, while indoor radiation is affected by both external conditions and the characteristics of building materials. The range of observed indoor dose rates has been found from 0.07 to 0.31 µSv/h with an average value of 0.15 µSv/h, and outdoor dose rates from 0.06 to 0.28 µSv/h with an average of 0.13 µSv/h. The terrain of the administrative map of Haridwar district has been classified into two categories based on altitude, viz., Highland and Lowland. The results show that unexpectedly high radiation in certain areas and subtle variations between highlands and lowlands suggest unmodeled factors may be contributing to radiation exposure patterns. Indoor spaces showed higher gamma radiation compared to outdoors. Radiation exposure changes depending on age, with infants receiving the most. The interplay of potential outliers has been discussed in detail.

Indexed as

Gamma dose rateIndoor environmentIonizing radiationRadiation doseSpecific activity

Identifiers

PMID41053266
PMCPMC12501056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.