ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Tooth color prediction in intraoral images under different clinical lights using ML algorithms and CLAHE technique: an In-Vivo study.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tooth color selection is a crucial step in prosthetic dental treatments. However, the process often suffers from subjectivity, environmental light variability, and the high cost or lack of standardization in instrumental methods. This study aims to develop a consistent and reliable tooth color prediction model using machine learning (ML) techniques, even under different clinical lights. In-vivo intraoral images of anterior teeth were collected from volunteer patients under five different clinical light sources. The teeth were annotated, segmented, and matched with corresponding color labels. LAB color space was used, and the CLAHE (Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization) technique was applied to the L-channel to reduce light-induced glare. To address class imbalance, data augmentation was performed, resulting in a balanced dataset of 16,640 images. The dataset was split into 80% training and 20% testing subsets. Five ML algorithms-Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and XGBoost-were evaluated. As a result of experimental studies, RF and XGBoost obtained the highest performance, both achieving an accuracy of 97% in predicting tooth color across different lighting scenarios. These results demonstrate the robustness of the approach under variable lighting conditions. This study demonstrates that ML algorithms combined with image enhancement techniques such as CLAHE can provide accurate and light-independent tooth color predictions. The proposed method offers a practical and low-cost tool to support clinical decision-making in prosthetic dentistry, potentially enhancing standardization and efficiency in color matching processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41053263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.