ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-stage ensemble framework for classifying pig vocalizations under noisy animal farm environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pig vocalizations are important indicators of health and emotional state, offering significant potential for advancing precision livestock farming. Accurate recognition of these vocalization patterns requires robust noise filtering and effective feature extraction. However, existing studies often focus on isolated patterns such as coughs, limiting their practical applicability in real-world settings. This study introduces the Pig Vocalization Multi-stage Classification (PVMC) model, a comprehensive framework designed to detect and classify a wide range of pig vocalizations under diverse farm conditions for assessing health and emotional stress. PVMC adopts a multi-stage approach that integrates cough and scream detection with emotional state classification, providing a holistic analysis of pig vocalizations. The proposed system features: (1) improved robustness across varying vocalization durations and noise levels, (2) customized model architectures optimized for each stage of the pipeline, and (3) an ensemble learning strategy combining Wav2Vec2 and AST (Audio Spectrogram Transformer) to enhance performance and computational efficiency. PVMC achieved a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement of up to 4.9dB, 95.80% accuracy in vocalization segmentation, 98.88% accuracy in key vocalization classification, and 92.15% accuracy in emotional state detection. Notably, the ensemble method significantly improved overall precision, recall, and F1-score. These results demonstrate the PVMC model's robustness and practical utility as a deployable solution for real-time pig vocalization monitoring, contributing to intelligent, welfare-oriented livestock management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.