Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053207›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrated multimethod analysis of miners' safety behavior and risk interaction for practical applications.

Xurui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xurui ChenCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China. 23403070423@stu.xust.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miners' safety behavior is a critical factor in mine safety management, and its implementation effectiveness significantly influences the establishment of safety ecosystems and sustainable industry development. This study constructs a multidimensional risk coupling analytical framework integrating Bayesian Network (BN) modeling, N-K theory, and Random Forest (RF) algorithms based on risk coupling theory. By systematically examining the three primary risk factors influencing miners' safety behaviors-individual perception, situational stress, and physical environment-the analysis reveals that the synergistic interaction between situational stress and physical environment is the principal pathway for systemic risk emergence. Furthermore, multidimensional factor coordination demonstrates significant potential in enhancing safety compliance rates. Heterogeneous behavioral patterns among miners were identified through cluster analysis, informing the development of customized intervention strategies. The study proposes three strategic recommendations: (1) Introducing differentiated risk classification protocols, (2) Optimizing intelligent early-warning response systems, and (3) Rebuilding safety culture ecosystems. These recommendations facilitate the transition from reactive regulatory compliance to proactive safety adaptation in mine operations. This research contributes novel perspectives to safety management research and establishes a systematic modeling foundation for optimizing miners' safety behavior interventions. The integrated methodology advances current analytical approaches in occupational risk assessment and provides actionable insights for industrial safety practices.

Indexed as

MinersMiningOccupational HealthSafety ManagementBayes TheoremHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBayesian networkIntelligent mineMiners’ safety behaviorN–K modelRisk coupling

Identifiers

PMID41053207
PMCPMC12501322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.