ArticleNature communications2025
Exploring the relative influence of atomic parameters on solid solution strengthening.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An active learning workflow for predicting misfit volume in body-centered cubic refractory high-entropy alloys.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing predictive models for solid solution strengthening is a key tool in alloy design, enabling the optimization of mechanical properties. This study aims to identify the primary factor governing solid solution strengthening, providing foundations for more accurate predictive models. In this work single-phase solid solution alloys are developed with differences in atomic volume and electronegativity among constituent elements. Unlike previous studies focusing on only one factor, this work employs alloys specifically designed to assess both variables simultaneously, operating at the boundary conditions of different strengthening models. Vanadium is selected for its large electronegativity difference relative to nickel, while palladium is chosen for its significant atomic volume difference. We demonstrate that atomic volume differences play a dominant role in solid solution strengthening. Moreover, each solid solution exhibits a critical grain size below which grain refinement influences mechanical properties more than solid solution strengthening. Finally, a Ni₅₀Pd₅₀ alloy is produced showing a stability of mechanical properties with increasing grain size.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.