Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053198›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Exploring the relative influence of atomic parameters on solid solution strengthening.

P H F Oliveira, C L G P Martins, G C Stumpf, J Spadotto, E J Pickering, W J Botta, C Bolfarini, F G Coury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P H F OliveiraDepartment of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. pedro.oliveira@ufscar.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2474-9396
C L G P MartinsDepartment of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
G C StumpfDepartment of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9457-1968
J SpadottoDepartment of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
E J PickeringDepartment of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7516-868X
W J BottaDepartment of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
C BolfariniDepartment of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-3694
F G CouryDepartment of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-2087

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education) Finance Code 001Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) 444393/2024-2, 403832/2023-3, and 301757/2022-4United States Department of Defense | United States Army | U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command | Army Research Office (ARO) W911NF-23-1-0310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing predictive models for solid solution strengthening is a key tool in alloy design, enabling the optimization of mechanical properties. This study aims to identify the primary factor governing solid solution strengthening, providing foundations for more accurate predictive models. In this work single-phase solid solution alloys are developed with differences in atomic volume and electronegativity among constituent elements. Unlike previous studies focusing on only one factor, this work employs alloys specifically designed to assess both variables simultaneously, operating at the boundary conditions of different strengthening models. Vanadium is selected for its large electronegativity difference relative to nickel, while palladium is chosen for its significant atomic volume difference. We demonstrate that atomic volume differences play a dominant role in solid solution strengthening. Moreover, each solid solution exhibits a critical grain size below which grain refinement influences mechanical properties more than solid solution strengthening. Finally, a Ni₅₀Pd₅₀ alloy is produced showing a stability of mechanical properties with increasing grain size.

Identifiers

PMID41053198
PMCPMC12501364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.