Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053189›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare professional: systematic review and a meta-analysis based on correlation coefficient.

Sümeyye Ulaş, İsmail Seçer

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sümeyye UlaşDepartment of Psychology, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey. sumeyye.ulas@erzurum.edu.tr.
İsmail SeçerDepartment of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenging conditions faced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) during the pandemic have been extensively discussed in the literature, particularly concerning Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS) and Burnout (BO). This study systematically compiled studies meeting the inclusion criteria and examining the relationship between STS and BO between 2019 and 2024 in the Web of Science and PubMed databases, conducting a correlational meta-analysis. While the PRISMA was adhered to in all stages of this manuscript, the Quality Assessment and Validity Tool for Correlational Studies was adhered to in evaluating the articles that met the inclusion criteria. This analysis included 61 publications involving 33.906 HCPs. When raw r coefficients were transformed into Fisher's z values, the correlation coefficients ranged between 0.1820 and 1.1881, with a 100% positive direction, and the weighted correlation coefficient was 0.6305 (95% CI: 0.5888 to 0.6721). The results indicate a strong positive relationship between the levels of STS and BO among HCPs during the pandemic. The validation of the strong relationship between STS and BO during the COVID-19 period underscores the critical need for the development of information dissemination, resources, support, or policies to strengthen HCPs against STS and BO in the face of future epidemics, pandemics, or situations that could negatively impact the functioning of the healthcare system. In other words, it can be suggested to develop training and awareness programs for HCPs in terms of STS and BO, strengthen support systems, improve workload and working conditions, ensure continuity in monitoring and evaluating HCPs in terms of BO and STS, etc.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Health PersonnelCompassion FatigueHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2BurnoutCorrelational meta-analysisHealthcare professionalsPandemicSecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID41053189
PMCPMC12501099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.