ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative estimation of the spread of acute diarrhea and dengue in India using statistical mathematical and deep learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- China-East Asia comparison of male infertility burden and trend prediction: evidence from GBD 2023.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to forecast the spread of acute diarrhoea and dengue diseases in India by conducting a comparative analysis of statistical, mathematical (compartmental), and deep learning time series models. Utilizing weekly reported cases and fatalities from January 1, 2011, to Week 33, 2024, we evaluated ten forecasting techniques, including Regression, Bayesian Linear Regression with MultiOutputRegressor + XGBoost, SIR model, Prophet, N-BEATS, GluonTS, LSTM, Seq2Seq, and the ARIMA statistical model. Performance was assessed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE). Our findings indicate that the ARIMA model excels in predicting acute diarrhoeal disease cases, achieving an RMSE of 317.7 and a MAPE of 2.4. Conversely, the Seq2Seq model outperforms others in forecasting dengue cases, with an RMSE of 399.1 and a MAPE of 6.3. Additionally, models such as N-BEATS and LSTM demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, while traditional models like Regression and the SIR compartmental model showed higher error rates. This research underscores the importance of selecting appropriate forecasting models to enhance disease prediction accuracy, thereby providing valuable insights for policymakers to effectively allocate healthcare resources and implement targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.