Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41053172›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comprehensive brain tumour concealment utilizing peak valley filtering and deeplab segmentation.

B P Pradeep Kumar, E Naresh, C K Raghavendra, Raguru Jayakrishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B P Pradeep KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Design, Atria Institute of Technology, VTU, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
E NareshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. naresh.cse@bmsce.ac.in.
C K RaghavendraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. raghavendrack.cse@bmsce.ac.in.
Raguru JayakrishnaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. raguru.krishna@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumour identification, segmentation cataloguing from MRI images is most thought-provoking and is a very much essential for many medical image analysis applications. Every brain imaging modality provides information about various parts of the tumor. In current years deep learning systems have shown auspicious outcomes in medical image investigation tasks. Despite several recent works achieved a significant result on brain tumour segmentation and classification, they come with an improved performance at the expense of increased computational complexity to train and test the system. This exploration paper investigates the efficacy of popular deep learning architectures namely Xception Net, MobileNet for classification and DeepLab for segmentation of the cancerous region of brain tumor. Each architecture is trained using a BRATS 2018 dataset and evaluated for its performance in accurately classifying tumor presence and delineating tumor boundaries. The DeepLab models accomplished a best segmentation result with Pearson Correlation Coefficient values 0.50 respectively and the deep learning models Xception Net and MobileNet achieved an accuracy of 0.8921 and 0.9176respectively. The experimental results show that these architectures achieve high accuracy and precise segmentation. The findings of this study contribute to advancing the field of medical image analysis and hold implications for improving the analysis and dealing of brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBrain tumour analysisDeepLab segmentationMobile NetMRI imagesXception Net

Identifiers

PMID41053172
PMCPMC12500853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.