ArticleScientific reports2025
Towards modular intelligent design method of subway station spatial with PointNet+.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PointNet++ has the functions of object recognition and semantic segmentation, and performs well in the recognition and classification of similar objects. It has been widely used in outdoor 3D scenes. The functional space layout of subway station buildings has the characteristics of similarity and replicability, so it is of great significance to adopt intelligent algorithm to modular design of functional space. In this study, plane data of subway stations in several cities were collected. Build 3D model and export cloud point data (X, Y,Z, rgbC), then enhance the data. The data set is divided into training set, verification set and test set according to the ratio of 8:1:1. The PointNet++ is used to train the 3D data set. Results show that the 3D data set derived from the building model runs well in the PointNet++ network, and can realize the effective transmission of information. Firstly, Pointnet++ model's recognition and classification results of training set meet expectations, and the stable values of Training mean loss and Training accuracy are 0.42 and 0.76, respectively. Secondly, the training model is used to predict the test set. The Eval avg class Accuracy and Eval Accuracy are 0.80 + and 0.75 + respectively, and the mean intersection over union is about 60%. Thirdly, the prediction results of the test set in the training model show that the Ground Truth and Predict are highly matched, and the model has a strong self-learning ability and can actively optimize the scheme space. This paper proposes a modular design method based on deep learning of 3D spatial data, which can identify and classify architectural space efficiently and accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.