ArticleNature communications2025
The impact of musical expertise on disentangled and contextual neural encoding of music revealed by generative music models.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory perceptual expertise: Amplitude modulation rate discrimination near the threshold for detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neural Representation of Exogenous and Endogenous Temporal Expectations Based on fMRI.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Music perception requires integrating individual notes into their broader musical context, yet how musical expertise shapes the neural encoding of this information across the auditory hierarchy remains unclear. Here, we address this by using the hierarchical representations from a generative music transformer model to predict human brain activity. We recorded scalp electroencephalography (EEG) from expert musicians and non-musicians, as well as intracranial EEG (iEEG) from six neurological patients, during listening to classical piano pieces. We found that deeper layers of the transformer, which represent more disentangled and contextual musical features, were more predictive of neural responses in both groups. However, this neural correspondence was significantly enhanced by musical expertise: for non-musicians, prediction accuracy plateaued across the model's final layers, whereas for musicians it continued to increase. This enhanced encoding in experts was also strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere. Finally, the iEEG recordings revealed an anatomical gradient for this function, where neural sites progressively farther from the primary auditory cortex encoded musical context more strongly. Our study reveals how musical training refines the hierarchical neural processing of music and provides a neuro-computational account of this remarkable cognitive skill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.