ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: analysis of post-transplant survival and risk factors in 138 Mayo Clinic patients.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk-Adjusted Comparison of Survival in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia With and Without Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Mayo Clinic Experience in 775 Consecutive Patients.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Germline DDX41 Variants: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only curative option in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). We retrospectively analyzed 138 CMML patients who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic. Patients who transitioned to ASCT while in chronic phase (Group A) displayed superior post-transplant survival (PTS), compared to those in whom ASCT was performed after blast transformation (BT; Group B) (median 95 vs. 16 months; p = 0.01). In Group A, PTS was superior in patients with <5% bone marrow (BM) blasts at time of ASCT (median 164 vs. 13.5 months; p = 0.01). Other predictors of superior PTS included day-100 BM blast <5% or normal cytogenetics (median 164 vs. 18 months; p = 0.01) or presence of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD; median 164 vs. 26 months; p = 0.01). Pre-ASCT hypomethylating agent exposure (HR = 2.03; p = 0.03), and receiving more than one line of pre-ASCT chemotherapy (p = 0.01) predicted inferior PTS. In multivariable analysis, predictors of superior GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) included the use of myeloablative conditioning and the absence of morphologically or cytogenetically apparent disease at day-100. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (p = 0.02) and numerically inferior PTS (p = 0.1). Group B patients also appeared to benefit from achieving BM blast <5% at the time of ASCT (p = 0.4) as well as at day-100 (p = 0.01), in terms of PTS, while full chimerism and normal cytogenetics at day-100 were associated with superior GRFS. These observations support the value of ASCT in CMML, especially if performed prior to BT and in the presence of <5% BM blasts at the time of ASCT. Additionally, the observed detrimental impact of PTCy requires additional studies to confirm and investigate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.