ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Susceptibility mechanisms for analyzing depressive symptoms in differently disadvantaged children from an integrative perspective: a network analysis and network comparison.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- External factors show reproducible local symptom-biomarker associations in middle-aged and older adults with heart disease.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Recognition of adaptive stress response patterns in adolescents based on multiple hair biomarkers.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Depression and poisoning in adolescents and young adults: a retrospective study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the network structure of depressive symptoms in disadvantaged children and adolescents and the network differences between them and non-disadvantaged individuals. We classified disadvantaged children from an integrated perspective, taking full account of sociodemographic factors and environmental risks. Latent profile analysis was used to identify environmental risk categories. Network analysis was used to examine the interrelationships between 27 symptoms of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and to identify the core symptoms. We evaluated network structure and global strength between different groups. If the difference in network structure was significant, the edge (connection) strength was evaluated. A total of 4574 children completed the survey. Combined with the results of the latent profile analysis, disadvantaged children were classified into four categories as follows: the socially demographic disadvantaged group, the environmental risk group, the doubly disadvantaged group and the non-disadvantaged group. There was a significant difference in the incidence of depression between the different groups, with the lowest incidence in the non-disadvantaged group (15.8%) and the highest incidence in the doubly disadvantaged group (52.72%). There was a significant difference between the network structure of depressive symptoms in the doubly disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged groups, with specific differential edges centered on the entries for self-esteem and interpersonal relationships. The global connectivity of the network was similar for the different groups. The results revealed that children with disadvantages have a greater incidence of depression. The core node of the depressive symptom network focuses on negative emotions. The susceptibility characteristics of depressive symptom networks focused on network structure, including specific edges of "self-esteem" and "relationships", rather than the global connectivity of the network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.