ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026
Exploring the views of key stakeholders on dementia risk prediction in primary care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing interest in personalised approaches to dementia risk assessment and prevention. Risk prediction tools can estimate an individual's likelihood of developing dementia, but none are currently used clinically. Socioeconomic deprivation may reduce opportunities for individuals to engage in healthy behaviours that support brain health even if risk is determined.
aimTo explore the potential challenges and facilitators in introducing dementia risk prediction tools into UK general practice, with an emphasis on those living in areas of socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN AND
settingThis was a qualitative study set in general practices from three geographical areas of England (Greater Manchester, North East, and South East).
methodSemi-structured qualitative interviews explored the views of key stakeholders about the use of risk prediction tools for future dementia. These were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsIn total, 71 participants were purposively sampled and interviewed (31 primary care staff; 40 patients). We identified four themes that influenced engagement with dementia risk prediction in general practice: 1) risk as an idea; 2) patient views on the impact of, and choice around, risk screening; 3) embedding risk prediction into clinical consultations; and 4) wider system-level engagement to support adoption of risk prediction tools to prevent dementia.
conclusionDementia risk assessment presents distinct challenges compared with other areas of medicine. Increased public awareness around dementia prevention and risk reduction can facilitate this process. When developing interventions, there needs to be a recognition of the need for a whole-systems approach that supports individuals to adopt strategies to reduce their risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.