Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052907›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026

Exploring the views of key stakeholders on dementia risk prediction in primary care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study.

Rebecca L Morris, Nicola Schmidt-Renfree, Wendy Joseph, David Reeves, Catharine Morgan, Blossom Christa Maree Stephan, Harm van Marwijk, Elizabeth Ford, Sarah Sowden, Lindsey Brown and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebecca L MorrisUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-0802
Nicola Schmidt-RenfreeBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton and Hove, UK.
Wendy JosephPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
David ReevesUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6377-6859
Catharine MorganUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9033-1986
Blossom Christa Maree StephanCurtin University, Perth, Australia.
Harm van MarwijkBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton and Hove, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-485X
Elizabeth FordBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton and Hove, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-8509
Sarah SowdenPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-3463
Lindsey BrownUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eugene Yee Hing TangPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK eugene.tang@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-9311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in personalised approaches to dementia risk assessment and prevention. Risk prediction tools can estimate an individual's likelihood of developing dementia, but none are currently used clinically. Socioeconomic deprivation may reduce opportunities for individuals to engage in healthy behaviours that support brain health even if risk is determined.

aimTo explore the potential challenges and facilitators in introducing dementia risk prediction tools into UK general practice, with an emphasis on those living in areas of socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a qualitative study set in general practices from three geographical areas of England (Greater Manchester, North East, and South East).

methodSemi-structured qualitative interviews explored the views of key stakeholders about the use of risk prediction tools for future dementia. These were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsIn total, 71 participants were purposively sampled and interviewed (31 primary care staff; 40 patients). We identified four themes that influenced engagement with dementia risk prediction in general practice: 1) risk as an idea; 2) patient views on the impact of, and choice around, risk screening; 3) embedding risk prediction into clinical consultations; and 4) wider system-level engagement to support adoption of risk prediction tools to prevent dementia.

conclusionDementia risk assessment presents distinct challenges compared with other areas of medicine. Increased public awareness around dementia prevention and risk reduction can facilitate this process. When developing interventions, there needs to be a recognition of the need for a whole-systems approach that supports individuals to adopt strategies to reduce their risk.

Indexed as

DementiaPrimary Health CareAgedEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factorsdementiageneral practiceinequalitiesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41052907
PMCPMC13044187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.