ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Interpreting Supervised Machine Learning Inferences in Population Genomics Using Haplotype Matrix Permutations.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Supervised machine learning methods, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that use haplotype matrices as input data have become powerful tools for population genomics inference. However, these methods often lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand which population genetics features drive their predictions-a critical limitation for method development and biological interpretation. Here, we introduce a systematic permutation approach that progressively disrupts population genetics features within input test haplotype matrices, including linkage disequilibrium, haplotype structure, and allele frequencies. By measuring performance degradation after each permutation, the importance of each feature can be assessed. We applied our approach to three published CNNs for positive selection and demographic history inference. We found that the positive selection inference CNN ImaGene critically depends on haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium patterns, while the demographic inference CNN relies primarily on allele frequency information. Surprisingly, another positive selection inference CNN, disc-pg-gan, achieved high accuracy using only simple allele count information, suggesting its training regime may not adequately challenge the model to learn complex population genetic signatures. Our approach provides a straightforward, model-agnostic, and biologically-motivated framework for interpreting any haplotype matrix-based method, offering insights that can guide both method development and application in population genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.