Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052434›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Home-Based Augmented Reality Exercise For People With Parkinson Disease: Qualitative Acceptability Study.

Lotte E S Hardeman, Esther van Benten, Eva M Hoogendoorn, Maaike van Gameren, Jorik Nonnekes, Melvyn Roerdink, Daphne J Geerse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lotte E S HardemanDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8087
Esther van BentenDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5094-0047
Eva M HoogendoornDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4554-3628
Maaike van GamerenDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-0520
Jorik NonnekesDepartment of Rehabilitation, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-1427
Melvyn RoerdinkDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8534-1124
Daphne J GeerseDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5277-6607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rising prevalence of Parkinson disease and the growing demand on the health care system underscore the need for accessible and innovative care solutions, such as Reality Digital Therapeutics (Reality DTx)-an augmented reality neurorehabilitation program that delivers remotely prescribed gait and balance exercises for people with Parkinson disease to perform at home.

objectiveAt a preimplementation stage, this qualitative study aimed to explore the acceptability of Reality DTx.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative study design was used. We conducted semistructured interviews, guided by the theoretical framework of acceptability, with 22 people with Parkinson disease who used Reality DTx at home for 6 weeks as part of a feasibility trial. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis using an inductive, semantic approach informed by critical realism.

resultsThe results of the reflexive thematic analysis are described in 3 themes and 9 subthemes. The 3 themes are "there was considerable interindividual variation," "the intervention is complementary to supervised physical therapy," and "adherence in the long term is crucial." Participants reported variable perceptions of effectiveness and variable experiences of effort to complete the Reality DTx program. They viewed Reality DTx as a valuable complement to supervised physical therapy and emphasized the indispensable role of the physical therapist for external control of long-term exercise adherence and for meaningful feedback on motor performance, as well as the desire for social connection. Flexibility in time and location was mentioned as a very important program characteristic, supporting long-term exercise adherence. Suggestions for improvement included enhanced visibility of progression in scores, increased variation in games, and the integration of competitive elements.

conclusionsRemotely prescribed, gamified, augmented reality exercises at home, complementary to supervised physical therapy, are acceptable to people with Parkinson disease. The findings inform future Reality DTx development and implementation from the perspective of people with Parkinson disease, which should be weighted with the perspectives of other stakeholders such as clinicians and other key decision-makers.

Indexed as

acceptabilityaugmented realityhome-based rehabilitationneurorehabilitationParkinson diseasephysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID41052434
PMCPMC12538193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.