Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052408›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2025

Stress and Well-Being Intervention and mHealth Delivery Adaptation for Latinx Millennial Caregivers: Qualitative User-Centered Design Approach.

Megan Thomas Hebdon, Galilea D Dupree, Janice Hernandez, Heather Cuevas, Michael Thomas, Shane Burt, Neil Peterson, Sharon D Horner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Megan Thomas Hebdon *College of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S. 2000 E., Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 1-801-581-3414.ORCID 0000-0003-1916-5043
Galilea D Dupree *Dell Seton Medical Center Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-6578-6857
Janice Hernandez *School of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-3112-0063
Heather Cuevas *School of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-6686
Michael Thomas *College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-1516-9702
Shane Burt *Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-5832-612X
Neil Peterson *College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-5752
Sharon D HornerSchool of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-4761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to adapt a stress and well-being intervention delivered via a mobile health (mHealth) app for Latinx millennial caregivers. This demographic, born between 1981 and 1996, represents a significant portion of caregivers in the United States, with unique challenges due to higher mental distress and poorer physical health than noncaregivers. Latinx millennial caregivers face additional barriers, including higher rates of being uninsured and increased caregiving burdens. Objective: We used a community-informed and user-centered design approach to tailor an existing mHealth app to better meet the stress and well-being needs of Latinx millennial caregivers. Methods: We used a 2-step, multifeedback approach. In step 1, Latinx millennial caregivers participated in focus groups to evaluate wireframes for the proposed mHealth app. In step 2, participants engaged in usability testing for 1 week, concluding with short interviews for feedback. Participants were recruited through various channels, including social media and community clinics. Data were analyzed inductively using a rapid qualitative content analysis approach. Results: A total of 29 caregivers (n=20, 69% women) participated in the study. Participants had a mean age of 31 (SD 4.10) years, with most (n=28, 97%) caring for an adult and 3% (1/29) caring for children with chronic conditions. All participants completed the step 1 focus groups, with a subset of 10% (3/29) of the caregivers completing the usability testing in step 2. The most liked features included (1) the stress rating scale because it helped them understand stress and mental health; (2) the mindfulness options, which allowed for flexible timing of activities; (3) the journaling prompts for addressing daily challenges and positive experiences; and (4) the resource list for its employment and financial content. One concern was that the journaling prompts may take too much time to complete after a long and hard day. Some suggestions for improvement included a better tracking system, gamification, caregiving education, a checklist of emotions to use with the journal, tailored resources, and ways to connect with other caregivers. During step 2, participants noted that the app was user-friendly but had some glitches and unclear privacy policies. Participants liked the meditation options, resource variety, and daily stress log but wanted more journaling space, longer meditations, and additional relaxation activities. Conclusions: Future iterations should consider integrating more personalized and community-specific resources, leveraging platforms such as podcasts for broader engagement, and the use of information-based videos to support caregiver skill acquisition. Caregivers expressed needs beyond the scope of the app, such as resource access, demonstrating the need for upstream and downstream interventions. This study reinforces that user-informed design is an ongoing and iterative process that requires balancing the needs of stakeholders and the feasibility of the recommended adaptations.

Indexed as

CaregiversHispanic or LatinoStress, PsychologicalUser-Centered DesignAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsQualitative ResearchTelemedicineUnited Statesfamily caregiverLatinxmHealthmillennialmobile healthuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID41052408
PMCPMC12500219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.